Wednesday, March 29, 2017

Living and Dying with Lazarus


We decided at the roundtable that the season of Lent this year should be called the season of Long John.  We have been stricken with a series of exceptionally long passages from John’s gospel.  I have always considered John’s Jesus to be especially long-winded, and now I see that is a quality he shares with John himself.
The long John story this week is on the raising of Lazarus, or better, the long lead-up to the raising of Lazarus.  It begins with Jesus’ apparent decision to let Lazarus die before he does anything.  “This illness isn’t fatal,” he says.  Only it is.  And Jesus knew that.
Two days later he tells his disciples that they will go to Bethany after all, adding, “Lazarus has died.”  What’s more, he tells them, he’s glad.  This seems inappropriate.
One member of the roundtable shared a story about a beloved friend who refused to allow her loved ones to hold a funeral for her.  She had left firm instructions with her family about this.  Friends didn’t know until after she died, and this news made them feel their grief compounded. 
“If I get my way, I’ll just go off to a secret place by myself and die alone.  No one will have to do anything,” another said.  Why, we asked, would you want that?  “So as not to cause trouble for anyone.”  I don’t know if she was serious or not.  But I do know that the “trouble” we go to is all for ourselves.  The funeral is for the living, not the dead. 
Mary and Martha are joined by their community in their grieving.  Mary’s friends never leave her side, following her wherever she goes.  I can imagine them joining their cries to hers in a ritual lament.  Both Mary and Martha go out to meet Jesus on the road and tell him, “Lord, if you had been here, my brother wouldn’t have died.” 
Is this an accusation? A statement of faith? Or just a fact?  The theological discussion that follows would suggest faith, but that doesn’t rule out resentment, does it?
Finally, he gets around to the act of raising Lazarus from his tomb, something about which, it turns out, Martha has reservations.  Nevertheless, Lazarus is summoned from the grave, unbound from his burial clothes, and set free.  Later, Jesus returns to the home of Mary, Martha, and Lazarus to dine with them, like a doctor following up with his patient.  I am troubled by the notion of Lazarus resurrected, partly because I wonder how it felt to be pulled out of rest.  But also because he will die again.  Possible soon, as the Pharisees plan to put Lazarus to death.  Again.  Apparently, to get rid of the evidence.
As Christians, we have complicated feelings about life and death.  We are taught not to fear death because Jesus Christ has the victory over death.  But we don’t embrace death, because we believe Jesus lived so we may have abundant life.  And judging from the wonderful works he did on earth, I don’t believe he was talking only about the after-life.

Death is a mystery, and life is also.  At birth, we cry tears of joy; at death, tears of sorrow.  Yet joy and sorrow are but two sides of the same coin.  When Lazarus was raised from his grave, Mary and Martha’s tears were a mixture of both.  In joy and in sorrow, in life and in death, we hold one another up, leaning on love where understanding ends. 

Tuesday, March 21, 2017

In the Eyes


“God doesn’t look at things like humans do.”  This is what the prophet Samuel hears from the Lord when he is in Bethlehem searching for the next king of Israel.  God has already found this future king; Samuel is merely trying to see who that is.  But it’s impossible to do unless you are seeking to look through the eyes of God.
Last Sunday in worship we practiced the Examen, where the intent is to look back over your day with God’s eyes.  Inviting God into the process gives us eyes to see what we couldn’t see before, showing us new ways of being, making transformation possible.  In the texts we are examining this week, vision is the theme running through both.  The stories of Samuel’s anointing of David and Jesus’ healing of a man who was blind from birth both have something to tell us about what it is to really see, and what it means to be blind.
We look for clues, just as Samuel did in his hunt for God’s chosen one, and we are likely to get confused.  The text warns us against looking on the outward appearance because God looks at the heart.  But then we wonder why the text bothers to tell us how handsome David was.  If God is looking only on the heart, why does his outward appearance matter?
It may or may not matter to God.  But your outward appearance certainly does influence how others see you and interact with you.  We know that attractive people tend to be more successful by conventional standards.  We get classified, categorized, on the basis of those qualities others can see.
And we know that the young blind man in John’s gospel had been categorized as an outcast – a sinner.  His imperfect appearance was believed to reflect an imperfect heart.  When Jesus healed him of his imperfection, this clearly upset the order of things.  He is a changed man.  How will the community relate to him now?
In general, I think people only like change that starts with them.  We don’t like it when change is forced on us by others, and when people in our orbit change, very often we resent it because it forces us to change too.  In our discussion at the roundtable, we became very interested in the question of how David’s brothers felt about his anointing.  We assumed that they would be resentful, for a variety of reasons – one being that this upset the family order.
In the same way, I think the Pharisees were upset not only because Jesus broke a Sabbath rule, but because he was messing with what they regarded as the natural order of things.  We don’t have to strain too hard to see the parallels between John’s story and the reality of first-century Christians who were struggling to redefine themselves in relation to the Jewish synagogue.  And it’s not too much more of a stretch to see our present-day efforts to effect transformation in the church.
How does God redefine us?  By what God sees in our hearts, perhaps.  The potential for being changed, conformed to God’s image, and then the possibility of becoming an agent of transformation in the community. We see it repeatedly: the Samaritan woman who tells the whole city to come and see this man Jesus; the formerly blind man who tells the Pharisees about Jesus, “One thing I know – I was blind but now I see.” 
It’s a simple thing, imperceptible to the eye, that can have dramatic effects.


Wednesday, March 15, 2017

Touching Water


What a powerful image water can be.  This week as we gathered at the roundtable, we shared two stories about water.  The Exodus story (Exodus 17:1-7) takes place in the wilderness after Moses has led the Israelites out of slavery in Egypt.  Out in the wilderness they find out how dependent they are on God, for there is neither food nor water out in this dry land.  But God provides manna for their hunger each morning, and then, to quench their thirst, God brings forth water from a rock. 
The gospel story (John 4:5-42) finds Jesus at a well outside a Samaritan city.  A Samaritan woman approaches the well, and Jesus strikes up a conversation with her.  They talk surprisingly easily – their conversation shifting back and forth between the literal water from the well and the metaphorical water of life that Jesus says he has to offer. 
As we read these texts together at the roundtable, we were repeatedly drawn back to the essential qualities of water.  Even though, in both stories, water is standing in for something bigger, more abstract, we found ourselves pulled back to the practical aspects of accessing water that is fit for drinking.  Our basic human need for water was showing through.
This is what makes water such a powerful image for spiritual things.  It elicits all kinds of emotions related to the pleasing and calming sensation of water, the relief of having your thirst sated, as well as the panic of knowing drinkable water is not available.  It was impossible for us to stay away from the physical aspects of water while we were trying to attend to the spiritual aspects of the image of water.  Water is a powerful image because it so closely links the material with the spiritual, the tangible with the ethereal, the concrete with the abstract.
Presbyterians are familiar with the criticism that we approach worship with too much head and not enough heart.  We are accused of loving the Lord with our whole mind – and leaving it at that.  Thus, an embodied spirituality is frequently hard for us.  In fact, the mere idea of spirituality may leave us mystified. 
When I first became a Presbyterian in the mid-1990s, I remember hearing fellow members speak of a desire to have more spirituality in their religious life, but they were not clear about what that actually meant.  Interestingly, we felt its lack but we were not yet sure what we were seeking.
Presbyterians, like some other denominations, have dwelt too much in theology as theory, words as concepts.  We behave as though we have risen above our bodies.  Yet our bodies stand abandoned and crying out in thirst.  How much more spiritual we might be if we, on a daily basis, connect the material with the spiritual. 
Richard Rohr writes, “’Thisness’ is the actual spiritual doorway to the everywhere and always, much more than concepts.”[1] Is it possible that the best pathway to things unknown are these ordinary known things, like water?  And that the way to greater spirituality that so many of us desire is simply being truly attentive to the material things of life?
Photo:  The Susquehanna River in Bloomsburg, PA



[1] Things Hidden: Scripture as Spirituality, p. 127