Tuesday, August 29, 2017

The Golden Rule?


“Is this just a long-winded way of saying we should obey the Golden Rule?” was the question that started our conversation at the roundtable this week. We read through these verses and found a lot to agree with. It’s about peace, it’s about love, it’s about acceptance. Cool. Yes, we were a little bemused by the part about heaping burning coals on our enemies’ heads, but we found reasonable explanations for how we should understand the intention. When someone treats you badly, it is still best to treat them with compassion. When we do, we might even find that our actions have a softening effect on them.
Then, the more we talked about this particular verse, the more we became aware of what this passage is really asking us to do. Paul is asking Christians to be the light that the world wants to snuff out. Return evil with good; return hostility with hospitality; return curses with blessing.
The key to understanding these words is to realize that we are being asked to extend Christian love to people who actively seek to cause us harm. While all of it might be contained in the Golden Rule, it certainly causes us to consider it more deeply than just a saying we would stitch into a needlepoint pillow. And when we think about what is involved in living these words, we quickly see it is more complicated and difficult than we thought before.
Our thoughts turned to the recent protests and counter-protests around the topics of racism and white supremacy, in particular. Our nation reveres the value of free speech, but when speech turns to violence it is no longer free. And when things turn violent, it raises the question: should violence be met with more violence? Or nonviolent resistance?
“If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all.” When is it possible? We would not all draw the line in the same place. One of the loosely-organized groups that showed up in Charlottesville is Antifa. The name is short for anti-fascists, and they exist to fight fascism and racism wherever they might be, using violence if necessary. Unsurprisingly, they often find it necessary.
Antifa members have taken on the task of defending peaceful anti-racism demonstrators. When armed Klansmen or Nazis show up, Antifa members are the ones to step between them and their targets. At the Charlottesville protests, clergy of all denominations came together to form a nonviolent resistance to the white supremacist protestors – to be the light that the world wants to snuff out. For much of the day they were the targets of nothing more than verbal abuse and some shoving. But later in the afternoon the white supremacists turned violent, and Antifa intervened, giving counter-protestors a chance to disperse. As one clergy member put it, “That’s when Antifa saved our lives.”
A couple of weeks later the same groups showed up in Berkeley, California. Signs were seen that read “Avenge Charlottesville.” Video showed Antifa members attacking and beating a man, rather too vigorously to be called a defensive action.
“If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all.” There is a part of me that would like to remove the first clause of this sentence and leave it at, “As far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all.” That would be ever-so-much simpler to interpret. But determining what is possible? That is a much longer conversation.

photo credit: By Original work by US government, scanned by Wing-Chi Poon - Scanned, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=4578869

No comments:

Post a Comment